dimecres, 15 de març del 2017

Human nature

Dear Philosophers,
When talking about societies we have to take into account and investigate what is it natural to create a society. It is natural? It is artificial? It is something necessary? Some philosophers have developed different theories about that.

Plato: Plato was the first one to say that no one is self-sufficient enough to live individually so we need to live in society. Human survival depends on mutual cooperation. The human person is a social being and our basic needs are satisfied completely when each person specialises in some occupation and then exchanges goods and services.

Aristotle: He claimed that we live in a society to supply our basic needs and to be safe. Men is by nature a social animal because those people who are unsociable naturally for Aristotle they are animals, beasts, and those people who are self-sufficient are considered Gods. He also said that our ultimate objective in society should be developing our human capacities abilities and reach happiness.

Locke: According to Locke human nature is characterised by reason and tolerance. In a natural state all people are equal and independent. Humans aso have this natural right to defend their life, their health, their liberty... If everyone defended their rights in a different way we will have a chaotic society. In order to avoid this natural state (conflicts) we have to create a civil society where everyone can have rights and duties.

Everything for today Philosophers, we are missing two more philosophers (Hobbes and Rosseau) we will see them another day!! See you soon.

Origin and foundations of moral norms

Dear Philosophers,
Yesterday I explained to you morality, the concepts related to it and the moral norms. Today it is the turn for me to explain you the different origins and foundation of moral norms. We can find three different origins.

DIVINE ORIGIN: Its origin and foundation is God and they are known through revelation. The moral action is judged here in our world and after death in the postmortem judgement. We should also know that the moral norm is absolute and immutable.


NATURAL ORIGIN: Its origin and foundation is nature (human nature). They are known through the study and invesstigation of how nature works. Human behaviour fits in a natural order and we csn find naturalist moralities.

CONVENTIONAL ORIGIN: Its origin and foundation is culture, history and society. They are based on the idea of what a society should ideally be and people can either agree or disagree. We can fins conventionalist moralities and they are based on utopías.

See you son philosophers!

dimarts, 14 de març del 2017

Moral norms

Dear Philosophers,
Today I bring you a new section. The last day we saw some theoretical points of view of morality so now we are going to study the moral norms.
What are moral norms? Why are they for? Moral norms are the criteria of judgement about the sorts of persons that we ought to be and the sort of actions that we ought to perform:
-They provide us consistency and stability.
-They provide us with patterns for human conduct.
-They are imperative.
-They regulate the relationship among people to guarantee the social coexistence.
-They are subject to historical, social and cultural evolution.
-They determine what is right and good within a given situation.

Morality and concepts related to it

Dear Philosophers,
We have started a new unit, the last day I talked you about the difference between Ethics and Politics. Today I am going to talk you about Morality and the concepts related to it. Morality comes from Latin and it means custom or way of living. This discipline is a dimensión of human related to the freedom to choose and the capacity to distinguish different ways of living. If you live in a moral way, you are a whole person.
We can find other concepts related to Morality:
-Moral conscience: an aptitude, faculty, intuition or judgement of the intellect that distinguishes right from wrong. Moral judgement may derive from values or norms
-Personal morality: a collection of moral norms chosen by an individual to guide his/her behaviour.
-Social morality: a collection of moral norms chosen by a society or a social group.
-Personal moral behaviour: is a set of actions carried out by an individual liable to be morally judged.
-Social moral behaviour: is a set of actions carried out by a social group liable to be morally judged.

See you son philosophers, hope you enjoy!

Ethics and Politics

Dear philosophers,
We have already finished the first unit of the second term. Now it is turn to start the second one... named Ethics and Politics.
At this new unit we will study the human being living in society. Ethics has to do with looking for and individual happiness and the objective of our society, reaching happiness. Whereas political philosophy has to do with common good/well being. The first concept, ethics it is more connected to the concept of good/bad behaviour and politics is the discipline which is responsable for analysing the political existing models. These new models are utopies, ideas of perfect societies. We should also take into account another discipline: citizenship. Citizenship involves playing an active part in society.
Everything for today, just a little introduction for you to start thinking about this topic.
See you soon!

Blue pill or red pill?

Dear Philosophers,
Today I would like to talk about the Matrix film. The Matrix is a science fiction movie where the main character, Neo, is a computer programmer at MetaCortex (a big software company) but he is also an underground hacker. The objective of Neo and the rest of the 'Matrix rebels' is to free the humans from the Matrix.
On the Matrix film we have got a very known scene where the protagonist must choose between embracing the truth of reality (red pill) or the pleasant ignorance of illusion (blue pill). Neo is offered to choice between a red or a blue pill. The red pill would allow him to escape from the Matrix and therefore live at the real world. The blue pill would lead him to stay in the Matrix, living on a pretend comfortable world.
What would you choose? Answer me bellow. I recommend you to see the film. Great movie!
See you soon

Dualist theories of reality

Dear philosophers,
We are about to finish the unit of metaphysics and Gnoseology but we must take a look at the dualist theories of reality first.
Plato's theory was based on the world of Ideas (metaphysics and reason) and for Aristotle the world of senses became the only reality for him. Whereas Plato was considered a poet and a mythologist, Aristotle was considered the first great biologist. This last one was worried about nature changes and he devoted his life to explain why these changes happened. Aristotle refused Plato's theory of Ideas on the following way. He agreed with Plato that nature and all objects flow, he disagreed on the contrary on the fact that there would be a form or idea existing independently. So, what it actually exists is an object or a reality that embraces the physical part and the idea existing on the same being. To sum up, that the physical and the immaterial part are the same. This theory is named hylomorphic theory.
Descartes was considered the father of Modern Western Philosophy. On his meditations on first Philosophy he developed his dualist view of reality. He claimed that the reality was made of three substances, two of them immaterial and the third one material. Immaterial: infinite substance (God) and spiritual substance (Soul). Material: material physical substance (Body). He claimed that the human being is the only being in nature that has his dualist compositions.



Everything for today! Thank you!

dilluns, 13 de març del 2017

More conceptual schemes

Dear philosophers,
As I have seen that the popplet about philosophy as a theoretical rationality helped a lot of you I have decided to create two more. One about "philosophy and the problem of reality" and another about "philosophy and the problem of truth".
Here I leave you my schemes.
Write me if you need something else to my e-mail: isabeldieguezg11@gmail.com
Thank you!!



Philosophy as a theoretical rationality

Hey Philosophers,
Here I upload you my conceptual schemes of philosophy as a theoretical rationality. Due to the fact that our society does not know for real the concept or rationality or reason. Because of these it is very interesting to have a look at this topic. For making it even easier I've created this popplet about the subject. Hope you enjoy!


Explanation of the cave's allegory

Dear philosophers,

As I said you I am going to explain you the allegory of the cave. The allegory of the cave talks about some prisoners that are living in an underground cave. They sit with their backs to the mouth of the cave with their hands and feet bound in such a way that they can only look at the back wall of the cave. Behind them is a high wall, and behind that wall pass human-like creatures. Because there is a fire behind these figures, they cast flickering shadows on the back wall of the cave. So the only thing the cave dwellers can see is this shadow play. They have been sitting in this position since they were born, so they think these shadows are all there are.

Imagine now that one of the cave dwellers manages to free himself from his bonds. To begin with, once he goes outside, he is dazzled by the sharp sunlight. He is also dazzled by the clarity of the figures because until now he has only seen their shadow. If he manages to climb over the wall and get past the fire into the world outside, he will be even more dazzled. But after rubbing his eyes he will be struck by the beauty of everything. For the first time he will see colors and clear shapes. 

The joyful cave dweller could now have gone skipping away into the countryside, delighting in his new-found freedom. But instead he thinks of all the others who are still down in the cave. He goes back. Once there, he tries to convince the cave dwellers that the shadows on the cave wall are but flickering reflections of "real" things. But they don't believe him. They point to the cave wall and say that what they see is all there is. Finally they kill him. 

Objectives of the Allegory of the cave: showing the philosopher's road from shadowy images to the true idea s and also illustrating Socrate's courage and his sense of pedagogic responsibilities. 

Thank you for reading me! 



The Allegory of the cave

Dear Philosophers
The allegory of the cave, on video. Looking forward to explain you with my words this story but for now I leave you with a link to a video.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1RWOpQXTltA

I am back

Hello dear philosophers,
I am back! Today I want to explain you my new objectives for the blog. First of all I would like to give you a bunch of definitions of a new unit. This unit talks about a very interesting topic, metaphysics and Gnoseology. Here I leave you with the definitions. Thank you and see you soon!

Methaphysics= is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of existence, being and the world.
Ontology= is the philosophical study of the nature of being, becoming, existence or reality as well as the basic categories of being and their relations.
Epistemology= is the study of the nature and scope (alcance) of knowledge and justified belief.
Realism= is the belief that our reality, or some aspect of it is ontologically independent of our conceptual schemes, linguistic practices, beliefs, etc. Reality is what you perceive + experience (culture).
Idealism= is the attitude that places special value on ideas and ideals as products of the mind, in comparison with the world as perceived through the senses. The reality that you perceive from your senses is not true. They only trust their thoughts/ideas as a reality, only one reality, all in the mind.
Creationism= is the belief that that humans, life, the Earth and the Universe were created by a supreme being or deity's supernatural intervention.
Materialist metaphysics/materialism= holds that the only thing that exists is matter or energy; that all things are composed of material and all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of material interactions. All material.
Dualist metaphysics/dualism= is a set of beliefs that begins with the claim that the mental and the physical have a fundamentally different nature. (Material+immaterial) the world is composed by these two concepts.
Spiritual metaphysics/spiritualism= they hold that matter does not exist, and reality is made up of immaterial beings. They deny the existence of matter.
Monism= the metaphysical and theological view that there is only one principle, essence, substance or energy. (🚫dualism/pluralism)
Pluralism= it distinguishes a position where one believes there to be ultimately many kinds of substances in the world.
Determinism= the philosophical proposition that every event, including human cognition, decision and action, is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences ▶️ FATE and FATALISM.
Indeterminism= is the concept that events (certain events, or events of certain types) are not caused, or not caused deterministically (eg. Casuality) by prior events.
Fatalism= a philosophical doctrine stressing the subjugation of all events or actions to fate.
Rationalism= a theory or method based on the thesis that human reason can in principle be the source of all knowledge. Deductive method. Universal and necessary truths. Important philosophers: Parmenides, Plato, Descartes, Spinoza. Connected with IDEALISM.
Empiricism= the doctrine that all knowledge ultimately comes from experience denying the notion of innate ideas or a priori knowledge about the world. Mind: blank paper filled with data from the sensutive experience. Inductive method. Important philosophers: Aristotle, Locke, Hume, Comte, Neopositivipt philosophers. Connected with REALISM.
Innoticism= a doctrine that holds that the mind is born with ideas or knowledge and that therefore the mind is not a "blank slate" at birth, as empiricists claimed. It asserts that not all knowledge is gained from experience and the senses.
Dogmatism= it claims the human knowledge is unlimited and it is possible to know the reality of the hole whole. Underestimates the relativity of knowledge and lays claim to knowledge of absolute, universal and doubtless truths through REASON. Dogmatic attitude: the truth cannot be questioned--> fanatism.
"ARGUMENTUM AR VERECUNDIAM" or "AUTHORITATIVE ARGUMENT"= is a special type of inductive reasoning argument which argues that something is an absolute truth because it has been confirmed by an authority you can trust. We are referring to the Bible, the church, Aristotle and Plato. Related with dogmatism.
Criticism: is a philosophical theory that asserts that we must first judge how human reason works and within that limits we will be able to correctly apply to the experience.
Relativism= is the concept that points of view have no absolute truth or validity, having all the relative, subjective value according to differences in perception and consideration. Protagoras was a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher. In his dialogue Protagoras, Plato credits him with having invented the role of the profesional sophist or teacher of virtue. He is also believed to have created a major controversy during ancient times through his statement "man is the mesure of all things". Truth is subjective and parcial.
Scepticism= is a position that refrains from making truth claims. It defends that it is not possible to know if universal truths exists. Moreover, although it existed, it could be impossible to understand it.
Agnosticism= is the view that claims that the truth of certain facts is unknown and unknowable specially related to God.